<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>markricciardi.org &#187; Wage-hour</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markricciardi.org/category/wage-hour/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markricciardi.org</link>
	<description>labor and employment law info for all employers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 00:03:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>The 2015 Nevada Legislatureâ€”What Can Employers Expect?</title>
		<link>http://www.markricciardi.org/the-2015-nevada-legislature-what-can-employers-expect/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markricciardi.org/the-2015-nevada-legislature-what-can-employers-expect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2015 17:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Ricciardi]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[collective bargaining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independent Contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Sector Unions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markricciardi.org/?p=81</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As far as most non-governmental employers are concerned, the Republican sweep of the Nevada Legislature will likely be known for what laws wonâ€™t be passed. I think employers will not see new or stricter laws in the following areas: &#160; &#8230; <a href="http://www.markricciardi.org/the-2015-nevada-legislature-what-can-employers-expect/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.markricciardi.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/crystal_ball_92335.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-82" src="http://www.markricciardi.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/crystal_ball_92335-201x300.jpg" alt="crystal_ball_92335" width="201" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>As far as most non-governmental employers are concerned, the Republican sweep of the Nevada Legislature will likely be known for what laws wonâ€™t be passed. I think employers will not see new or stricter laws in the following areas:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul>
<li>Protections for employees using medical marijuana.</li>
<li>The availability of bigger dollar damages in discrimination cases under state law.</li>
<li>The definition of or regulation of independent contractors.</li>
<li>Changes to the state wage/hour/overtime law.</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I do predict serious debate and probable action on laws dealing with:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul>
<li>Whether local governments should still be obligated to engage in collective bargaining with employees.</li>
<li>Even if collective bargaining is required, which subjects will not be subject to bargaining but will be left to the discretion of the local government employer.</li>
<li>No matter what public employee unions can bargain over, will all automatic wage and benefit changes continue to occur even after contract expiration (the â€œevergreen doctrineâ€).</li>
<li>Whether public employee contracts should permit employees to use paid time to carry out union business.</li>
<li>Will public employee unions be required to annually disclose financial information. (See why this issue is important <a href="http://www.markricciardi.org/what-public-employee-unions-dont-want-their-members-or-the-public-to-know/" target="_blank">here</a>Â and in the next bullet point).</li>
<li>Whether taxpayer paid local government payroll systems should be used to provide unions with free payroll deduction services for union dues and political contributions. (Of course without transparency of union finances that innocent-sounding &#8220;dues&#8221; deduction could include money the unions use for political purposes. Â See the preceding bullet point on the transparency issue).</li>
<li>Whether and how the public employee pension statute (PERS) is changed.</li>
<li>Whether union protesters should be given a pass on complying with the Nevada stalking laws. (See <a href="http://www.leg.state.nv.us/nrs/nrs-200.html#NRS200Sec571" target="_blank">NRS 200.575 (g)(1)</a>.)</li>
<li>Whether contractors (and ultimately the taxpayers) working on Nevada public construction projects must pay the union dictated &#8220;prevailing&#8221; wage and benefit rate.</li>
<li>Whether employers should be subject to the risk of a defamation suit just because they try to tell their side of the story. (See why this issue is important <a href="http://www.markricciardi.org/continue-caution-when-speaking-of-former-employees-even-during-litigation/" target="_blank">here.</a>)</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The public employee collective bargaining reforms will be in play because conservatives will insist on changes in return for supporting any tax proposals. Â The debate will be off to a good start especially thanks to some excellent ideas set out in Las Vegas Review Journal editorials <a href="http://www.reviewjournal.com/opinion/editorial-end-bargaining-paid-time" target="_blank">here</a> and <a href="http://www.reviewjournal.com/opinion/editorial-public-shouldn-t-foot-bill-union-activities" target="_blank">here</a>. Â In addition, the assembly caucus has <a href="http://www.npri.org/blog/detail/week-in-review-the-future" target="_blank">hired</a>Â a former NPRI staffer and he will have a serious game plan.</p>
<p>Expect unions to mobilize quicklyâ€”especially the large international unions that represent both local government employees and private employers. The ones to watch are the <a href="http://www.seiu.org" target="_blank">SEIU</a>, <a href="http://teamster.org/" target="_blank">Teamsters</a>,Â Â <a href="http://www.iuoe.org/" target="_blank">Operating Engineers</a>Â and of course the <a href="http://client.prod.iaff.org/#" target="_blank">Firefighters</a>. Â Even if the unions feign a willingness to agree to certain &#8220;reforms&#8221; Republicans will be very cautious. Â The last time there were &#8220;compromises&#8221; the very adept union lobbyists who know every nuance in NRS 288 were able to avoid giving up anything significant.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Stay tuned!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markricciardi.org/the-2015-nevada-legislature-what-can-employers-expect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five Things That Did Not Happen to Employers in 2013</title>
		<link>http://www.markricciardi.org/five-things-that-did-not-happen-to-employers-in-2013/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markricciardi.org/five-things-that-did-not-happen-to-employers-in-2013/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jan 2014 00:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Ricciardi]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hiring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independent Contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interest Arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minimum wage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NLRB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Overtime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Sector Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union avoidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wage-hour]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markricciardi.org/?p=67</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems that the EEOC, the DOL, the NLRB, the unions and plaintiffsâ€™ lawyers are always on the verge of doing something that causes headaches or worse for employers.Â  There were things employers feared or hoped for in 2013.Â  Here &#8230; <a href="http://www.markricciardi.org/five-things-that-did-not-happen-to-employers-in-2013/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that the<a href="http://www.eeoc.gov" target="_blank"> EEOC</a>, the <a href="http://dol.gov" target="_blank">DOL</a>, the <a href="http://nlrb.gov" target="_blank">NLRB</a>, the unions and plaintiffsâ€™ lawyers are always on the verge of doing something that causes headaches or worse for employers.Â  There were things employers feared or hoped for in 2013.Â  Here are five to think about and plan for in 2014.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">#1Â Â Â Â Â Â  The pace of wage-hour claims did not slow down</span></p>
<p>We saw continued aggressive enforcement of minimum wage and overtime laws by the <a href="http://www.laborcommissioner.com/" target="_blank">Nevada Labor Commission</a> and the <a href="http://dol.gov" target="_blank">US DOL</a> during 2013.Â  The following issues were the most troublesome for employers:</p>
<ul>
<li>Which Nevada Minimum Wage applies?Â  See <a href="http://www.laborlawyers.com/new-nevada-minimum-wages-take-effect-july-1-2010" target="_blank">this </a>for help.</li>
<li>When is daily overtime due under Nevada law?Â  See <a href="http://www.laborlawyers.com/new-nevada-minimum-wages-take-effect-july-1-2010" target="_blank">this</a> for help.</li>
<li>Can an employer force a tip sharing arrangement on employees?Â  The answer in Nevada is generally yes.Â  Despite the 9<sup>th</sup> Circuitâ€™s clear <a href="http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/02/23/08-35718.pdf" target="_blank">holding</a> that the federal tip sharing rules do not apply to non-tip credit states like Nevada, you can expect the <a href="http://dol.gov" target="_blank">DOL</a> to continue to try and meddle in tip-sharing programs.Â  The most fertile area for litigation in Nevada involves who can particpage in a tip pool.Â  For now Steve Wynn has <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6-ZxYIAbUOObjdoa2FYLW1ROFk/edit?usp=sharing" target="_blank">cleared</a> the way for certain employees who look like supervisors to participate in a tip pool.</li>
</ul>
<p>The US <a href="http://dol.gov" target="_blank">DOL</a> has set out its priorities in its 2014 budget justification <a href="http://www.dol.gov/dol/budget/2014/PDF/CBJ-2014-V2-09.pdf" target="_blank">document</a>:</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Â </span></p>
<p><i>At the FY 2014 Request Level, WHD requests $243,254,000 and 1,872 FTE. These resources will support a continued shift to greater directed and complaint enforcement activity in priority industries and will offer an improved customer service approach to complaint handling in lower priority industries. WHD will continue to increase its number of compliance actions, but anticipates that continued gains in compliance actions concluded will be incremental as WHD maintains its emphasis on conducting quality case work and concentrates on no-violation cases through effective compliance screening and investigation targeting. At the request level, WHD is increasing its percentage of directed investigations. WHD data show a higher number of employees affected and greater back wages on average for directed investigations.</i></p>
<p><i>â€¦</i></p>
<p><i>Â </i><i>The agency will continue to use its directed investigations to increase WHD presence in high risk industries, i.e., those industries with high minimum wage and overtime violations and among vulnerable worker populations where complaints are not common.</i></p>
<p>For more good information follow the <a href="http://wage-hour.net/" target="_blank">Fisher &amp; Phillips Wage and Hour Blog</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">#2Â Â Â Â Â Â  The scrutiny of employers who use independent contractors did not stop</span></p>
<p>While state coffers continue to hurt, various agencies continue to aggressively audit employers who use independent contractors.Â  See<a href="http://www.laborlawyers.com/beware-of-misclassifying-workers-as-independent-contractors" target="_blank"> this</a> for assistance.</p>
<p>The US <a href="http://dol.gov" target="_blank">DOL</a> also aggressively investigates misclassification issues.Â  In fact, in its budget justification <a href="http://www.dol.gov/dol/budget/2014/PDF/CBJ-2014-V2-09.pdf" target="_blank">document</a>, the DOL requested $3.8 million in its FY 2014 budget to, among other things, hire 35 FTEs for increased enforcement related to misclassified workers.Â  In an effort to help out the states and put employers under further pressure the DOL also promised to â€œleverage its relationships with other federal, state, and local agencies and with worker, employer, and community organizations.â€</p>
<p>For more good information follow the <a href="http://wage-hour.net/" target="_blank">Fisher &amp; Phillips Wage and Hour Blog.</a></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Â </span></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">#3Â Â Â Â Â Â  The NLRB did not formally issue its â€œquickie electionâ€ rules</span></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Â </span>After a federal court quickly <a href="http://www.chamberlitigation.com/sites/default/files/cases/files/2011/Chamber%20of%20Commerce,%20et%20al.%20v.%20NLRB%20%28Decision%29.pdf" target="_blank">struck down</a> the NLRBâ€™s proposed quickie election rules nothing much happened.Â  However the proposed rule is still on the NLRBâ€™s official <a href="http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/eAgendaViewRule?pubId=201310&amp;RIN=3142-AA08" target="_blank">agenda</a>.Â  With a full and legally appointed and confirmed NLRB you can count on this rule be officially reissued during 2014.Â  <a href="http://www.markricciardi.org/three-steps-to-take-right-away/" target="_blank">Here </a>(see Step #3)Â is how to start getting ready.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Â </span></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">#4Â Â Â Â Â Â  A number of public sector unions in Nevada did not get the memo that local government budgets are in <b><i>still in</i></b> horrible shape</span></p>
<p>Some local governments are seeing their way to modest COLAs and some unions are getting them in arbitration.Â  But as for the long term structural changes that must be made to public sector compensation many unions just donâ€™t get it.Â  Look for upcoming fact-finding and interest arbitration proceedings made necessary by unions who refuse to give up the kinds of benefits which are disappearing across the state and the country:</p>
<ul>
<li>Â Longevity</li>
<li>Automatic (â€œspringingâ€) raises to pay the employeesâ€™ portion of PERS increases</li>
<li>Employer payment of retiree health benefits</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Â </span></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">#5Â Â Â Â Â Â  The EEOC did not shrivel up and blow away</span></p>
<p>The EEOC did not stray much from its previously stated enforcement priorities.Â  It did have a <a href="http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424127887323838204579002892979510718" target="_blank">setback</a> in court when it tried to challenge an employerâ€™s right to use criminal conviction information in hiring.Â  While the EEOCâ€™s broad attack was unsuccessful in that particular case, you must exercise care not to make hiring decisions based solely on a criminal conviction without looking at the specifics of the situation.Â  See <a href="http://www.laborlawyers.com/beware-eeoc-focusing-on-criminal-checks" target="_blank">this f</a>or assistance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markricciardi.org/five-things-that-did-not-happen-to-employers-in-2013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tell Your CPA About This Program Right Away!</title>
		<link>http://www.markricciardi.org/tell-your-cpa-about-this-program-right-away/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markricciardi.org/tell-your-cpa-about-this-program-right-away/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2013 22:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Ricciardi]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independent Contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minimum wage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Overtime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wage-hour]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markricciardi.org/?p=64</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most certified public accountants and other accounting professionals are not only employers themselves but also help their employer clients navigate many tricky waters.Â  We decided that our CPA clients and friends would benefit from a breakfast briefing on the hot &#8230; <a href="http://www.markricciardi.org/tell-your-cpa-about-this-program-right-away/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most certified public accountants and other accounting professionals are not only employers themselves but also help their employer clients navigate many tricky waters.Â  We decided that our CPA clients and friends would benefit from a breakfast briefing on the hot topics facing them and their clients.Â  The program is scheduled for Wednesday December 11 at the Tuscany Suites.</p>
<p>Now for the first time we have put together a special half-day update designed just for CPAs and accounting professionals.Â  In addition to an in-depth discussion of the tricky Nevada minimum wage and overtime law, learn about the multi-pronged attack that government agencies and plaintiffsâ€™ lawyers are waging against employers who misclassify employees as independent contractors.</p>
<p>And of course our expert benefits attorney will provide attendees with up to date information on what they and their clients need to know about the Affordable Care Act.</p>
<p>Register and get more information <a href="http://www.laborlawyers.com/ho-ho-ho-theres-something-you-should-know-about-important-regulations-obligations-and-new-requirements-affecting-your-clients-businesses" target="_blank">here</a>.Â  Or you can call Michele Pacconi at (702) 862-3808.</p>
<p>Not a CPA?Â  Watch for information about special breakfast briefings coming up in 2014 designed specifically for the Restaurant/Nightclub industry, the Health Care industry and the Construction/Homebuilder industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markricciardi.org/tell-your-cpa-about-this-program-right-away/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nevada Labor Commissioner Intends to Consider the USDOL Time Clock Rounding Rule Compliant With Nevada Law</title>
		<link>http://www.markricciardi.org/nevada-labor-commissioner-intends-to-consider-the-usdol-time-clock-rounding-rule-compliant-with-nevada-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markricciardi.org/nevada-labor-commissioner-intends-to-consider-the-usdol-time-clock-rounding-rule-compliant-with-nevada-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jul 2013 20:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Ricciardi]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wage-hour]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markricciardi.org/?p=54</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; &#160; The Nevada Labor Commissioner recently issued an Advisory Opinion regarding time clock rounding. Â  The Commissioner had previously used a very strict interpretation of the wage statute to conclude that any rounding of time entries was unlawful. &#160; &#8230; <a href="http://www.markricciardi.org/nevada-labor-commissioner-intends-to-consider-the-usdol-time-clock-rounding-rule-compliant-with-nevada-law/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div id="attachment_55" style="width: 310px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="http://www.markricciardi.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/old-timeclock-06.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-55" alt="1889: One of the first commercial time clocks from Willard and Harlow Bundy of the Bundy Manufacturing Co. in Binghamton, NY " src="http://www.markricciardi.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/old-timeclock-06-300x225.jpg" width="300" height="225" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">1889: One of the first commercial time clocks from Willard and Harlow Bundy of the Bundy Manufacturing Co. in Binghamton, NY</p></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.laborcommissioner.com/" target="_blank">Nevada Labor Commissioner r</a>ecently issued an <a href="https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B6-ZxYIAbUOOMWJiVTNjSUFCZ0E/edit?usp=sharing" target="_blank">Advisory Opinion</a> regarding time clock rounding. Â  The Commissioner had previously used a very strict interpretation of the wage statute to conclude that any rounding of time entries was unlawful.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>In the Advisory Opinion the Commissioner concludes that time clock rounding is appropriate so long as the rounding policy is used in a manner that does not result, over a period of time, in a failure to compensate employees properly for all the time actually worked.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Prior to the issuance of the attached letter the many Nevada employers who use the USDOL rounding rule were theoretically at risk under the Commissioner&#8217;s interpretation of Nevada law. Â Although the Advisory Opinion does not bind the courts, I think most courts would find the Commissioner&#8217;s rationale to be persuasive.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Employers, (especiallyÂ large ones), are targets for <a href="http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2009/jul/23/lawsuit-against-station-alleging-unpaid-wages-dism/#axzz2Z3MNT2ri" target="_blank">class action suits</a> overÂ time clockÂ rounding. Â ThereforeÂ you need to be sure that even if you are rounding under the rule approved by the Commissioner you are doing it correctlyâ€”read <a href="http://www.laborlawyers.com/13122" target="_blank">this article </a>by my partner John ThompsonÂ to get more information on how to perform rounding properly.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markricciardi.org/nevada-labor-commissioner-intends-to-consider-the-usdol-time-clock-rounding-rule-compliant-with-nevada-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t Miss The Fisher &amp; Phillips 2013 Employment Law Seminar</title>
		<link>http://www.markricciardi.org/dont-miss-the-fisher-phillips-2013-employment-law-seminar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markricciardi.org/dont-miss-the-fisher-phillips-2013-employment-law-seminar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2013 19:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Ricciardi]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minimum wage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Overtime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wage-hour]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markricciardi.org/?p=44</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; It is already time for our annual employment law seminar. Â Never have there been more legal developments for employers to keep up with. The Las Vegas presentation takes place on May 2, 2013 at: Tuscany Suites and Casino 255 &#8230; <a href="http://www.markricciardi.org/dont-miss-the-fisher-phillips-2013-employment-law-seminar/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>It is already time for our annual employment law seminar. Â Never have there been more legal developments for employers to keep up with. The Las Vegas presentation takes place on May 2, 2013 at:</p>
<p align="center"><b>Tuscany Suites and Casino<br />
255 E. Flamingo Road<br />
Las Vegas, NV 89169</b></p>
<p style="text-align: left;" align="center">Click <a href="http://www.laborlawyers.com/2013seminars" target="_blank">here</a> to register or find about other seminar locations around the country. Â This year&#8217;s topics and speakers at our Las VegasÂ presentationÂ will be outstanding. Â In addition to the very timely topics described below, donâ€™t miss our lunchtime roundtable discussion on how to deal with wage and hour audits. We are very pleased to announce that <a href="http://business.nv.gov/PressReleases/2011/PR-2011-11-1TowlerLaborCommissioner.pdf" target="_blank">Nevada Labor Commissioner Thoran Towler</a> has agreed to be a member of our lunchtime roundtable.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;" align="center">For more information or registration questions, contact<br />
Ilene Hasforth by phone at (702) 252-3131 or by e-mail at<br />
<a href="mailto:ihasforth@laborlawyers.com">ihasforth@laborlawyers.com</a></p>
<p align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration: underline;">AGENDA</span></b></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p align="center"><b>May 2, 2013</b></p>
<p><b>Â </b></p>
<p>8:00 a.m. &#8211; 9:00 a.m.:Â Â Â Â  <b>Registration and Breakfast</b></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>9:00 a.m. &#8211; 10:00 a.m.:Â Â  Session 1</p>
<p><b>Accommodations &amp; the ADA: Practical Solutions to Real Workplace ChallengesÂ Â Â  </b></p>
<p><i><a href="http://www.laborlawyers.com/mricciardi" target="_blank">Mark J. Ricciardi, Esq</a>. &amp; <a href="http://www.laborlawyers.com/wselert" target="_blank">Whitney J. Selert, Esq.</a><a href="mailto:wselert@laborlawyers.com"><br />
</a></i></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>10:00 a.m. &#8211; 11:00 a.m.: Session 2</p>
<p><b>In Our Back</b><b> </b><b>Yard: Hot Topics on Nevada Specific Labor and Employment Law </b></p>
<p><i><a href="http://www.laborlawyers.com/ddornak" target="_blank">David B. Dornak, Esq.</a> &amp;<a href="http://www.laborlawyers.com/agolden" target="_blank"> Anthony B. Golden, Esq.</a><br />
<a href="mailto:agolden@laborlawyers.com"><br />
</a></i></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>11:00 a.m. &#8211; 11:15 a.m.: <b>Break</b></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>11:15 a.m. &#8211; 12:15 p.m.: Session 3</p>
<p><b>Healthcare Reform for the HR Professional: What Do You Need to Know and Do?Â  </b></p>
<p><i><a href="http://www.laborlawyers.com/ccarter" target="_blank">Callan G. Carter, Esq.</a><br />
<a href="mailto:ccarter@laborlawyers.com"><br />
</a></i></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>12:15 p.m. &#8211; 1:15 p.m.:Â  <b>Lunch &#8211; </b><b>Roundtable Discussion.Â  Wage and Hour Audits.</b></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>1:15 p.m. &#8211; 2:15 p.m.:Â Â Â  Session 4</p>
<p><b>Four More Years: The Future of Labor and Employment LawÂ  </b></p>
<p><i><a href="http://www.laborlawyers.com/wselert" target="_blank">Whitney J. Selert, Esq.</a> &amp; <a href="http://www.laborlawyers.com/mcecil" target="_blank">Matthew T. Cecil, Esq.</a><br />
<a href="mailto:mcecil@laborlawyers.com"><br />
</a></i></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>2:15 p.m. &#8211; 3:15 p.m.:Â Â Â  Session 5</p>
<p><b>Your Action Plan: Ten Things to Do When You Get Back to Your Office </b></p>
<p><i><a href="http://www.laborlawyers.com/ddornak" target="_blank">David B. Dornak, Esq. </a>&amp; <a href="http://www.laborlawyers.com/agolden" target="_blank">Anthony B. Golden, Esq.</a><br />
<a href="mailto:agolden@laborlawyers.com"><br />
</a></i></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>3:15 p.m. &#8211; 3:30 p.m.:Â Â Â  <b>Break</b></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>3:30 p.m. &#8211; 4:30 p.m.:Â Â Â  Session 6</p>
<p><b>Sex, Lies and INVESTIGATE THIS!!</b></p>
<p><i><a href="http://www.laborlawyers.com/smahoney" target="_blank">Scott M. Mahoney, Esq.</a><br />
<a href="mailto:smahoney@laborlawyers.com"><br />
</a></i></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>4:30 p.m. &#8211; 5:00 p.m.:Â Â Â  <b>Final Questions and Adjourn</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markricciardi.org/dont-miss-the-fisher-phillips-2013-employment-law-seminar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Five 2013 Resolutions for Employers</title>
		<link>http://www.markricciardi.org/top-five-2013-resolutions-for-employers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markricciardi.org/top-five-2013-resolutions-for-employers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 00:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Ricciardi]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exemptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harassment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independent Contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NLRB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Overtime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union avoidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wage-hour]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markricciardi.org/?p=36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The year 2013 will be another challenging year for employers. Unions and plaintiffs&#8217; attorneys will be emboldened by the government&#8217;s aggressive post election energy. Â If you don&#8217;t know what to do first here are five things to act on promptly. &#8230; <a href="http://www.markricciardi.org/top-five-2013-resolutions-for-employers/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The year 2013 will be another challenging year for employers. Unions and plaintiffs&#8217; attorneys will be emboldened by the government&#8217;s aggressive post election energy. Â If you don&#8217;t know what to do first here are five things to act on promptly.</p>
<p><strong>Resolution #1:Â  I Will Self Audit Our Companyâ€™s Wage-Hour Practices</strong></p>
<p>According to its strategic plan, the Wage and Hour Division of the US Department of Labor will continue to aggressively pursue employers who:</p>
<ul>
<li>Fail to pay overtime where required</li>
<li>Improperly consider employees to be exempt from overtime</li>
<li>Misclassify employees as independent contractors</li>
</ul>
<p>Being snagged on wage-hour violations hurts, not just because it ends up costing money but also because a vigilant company can discover these types of problems fairly easily. Trying to root out harassment or embezzlement can be difficult because those activities are frequently done surreptitiously.Â  On the other hand, HR and company management can easily find out if there are wage hour problems by looking at payroll records, employee duties and hours worked.Â  There is little excuse for being surprised by the findings of a DOL audit.</p>
<p>The idea of a self audit is to do what the DOL would do if it showed up for an auditâ€”but do it yourself now while you have time to correct mistakes or reconsider the risky things you have been doing on purpose. Self audits can be done by your employment attorneys. They can also be done in house â€“weâ€™ve taught lots of clients how.</p>
<p>For a refresher on the Fair Labor Standards Act, read <a href="http://www.laborlawyers.com/files/33404_FLSA%20Exemptions%20and%20Recordkeeping%202012.PDF" target="_blank">this booklet</a> and <a href="http://www.laborlawyers.com/files/28794_flsa%20wage-hour%202011.PDF" target="_blank">this booklet</a>.Â  For up to date wage-hour information and developments follow the <a href="http://wage-hour.net" target="_blank">Fisher &amp; Phillips Wage and Hour Law Blog.</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Resolution #2:Â  I Will Review Our Companyâ€™s Social Media Policy</strong></p>
<p>Of course you must first be sure that have a social media policy. Â Â No company can afford to be without one. It does not need to be extensive but it must be carefully written because last year the NLRB issued a number of rulings that create a confusing minefield.Â  Here is a <a href="http://mynlrb.nlrb.gov/link/document.aspx/09031d4580a375cd" target="_blank">report</a> issued by the NLRB last year, which summarized the cases decided by the NLRB though the first half of 2012.Â  Note that at the end of the report there is a social media policy that the General Counsel of the NLRB found to be completely legal!Â  Resist the urge to simply adopt it verbatimâ€”you should still tailor it to your operation <i>and </i>run it past your labor lawyer.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Resolution #3: Â I Will Take Steps to Union Proof Our Company</strong></p>
<p>Unless you have been living under a rock you know that the NLRB, packed with union leaning appointees, last year tried to:</p>
<ul>
<li>Â Force every employer to post a notice informing its employees of the their right to join a union.</li>
<li>Change the rules so that employers can be ambushed with a union election on 14 days notice.</li>
<li>Require all employers to publicly thank unions for all they have done for society (OK maybe the NLRB didnâ€™t actually try to do this but you know they really wanted to).</li>
</ul>
<p>Meanwhile the DOL tried to amend its regulations to require Â your labor attorneys to file reports telling the government how much you paid to them for helping keep you union free.</p>
<p>These initiatives did not come to fruition but expect them to be reintroduced this year.</p>
<p>To begin the union proofing process, start by learning the basics about the law of union organizing by reading <a href="http://www.laborlawyers.com/files/27190_NLRA%20Union%20ORG%202011%20final.PDF" target="_blank">this booklet</a> on the union organizing aspects of the National Labor Relations Act. Also read <a href="http://www.laborlawyers.com/files/29388_NLRA%20ULP%20August%202011.PDF" target="_blank">this booklet</a> on unfair labor practice liability under the National Labor Relations Act.</p>
<p>Then perform a union vulnerability audit on your own or with the help of your labor attorney. Start by using <a href="http://www.laborlawyers.com/files/31118_Employee%20Relations%20Audit%20Checklist%20FINAL.pdf" target="_blank">this tool</a>. Â  Many of our clients have made changes based on the audit results and those changes have helped insulate companies from union organizing.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Resolution #4:Â  I Will Schedule Management Training</strong></p>
<p>When times are tough training budgets are one of the first things to go.Â  Times are still tough but the aggressive government enforcement agenda makes training too important to continue to ignore.Â  What to cover?Â  At a minimum you must conduct a refresher on harassment and discrimination prevention.Â  In the early years such training lasted several hours.Â  It still warrants time but you can really cover the basics in less than two hours. Â Use that extra time to cover union awareness. Â That means you educate supervisors and managers about unions and how to spot the early warning signs of union organizing.Â  That training must also cover â€œManagement 101â€.Â  In that segment supervisors and managers will learn good communication skills and how to properly use progressive discipline.Â  It should be everyoneâ€™s goal after the training to make the workplace so comfortable that your employees would never even consider bringing in a union.Â  Bonus:Â  those same management techniques learned in the training will reduce employment claims and make it easier to successfully defend employment claims.Â  Do the training in house, use your labor attorney, or use some combination of the two.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Resolution #5:Â  I Will Eat Less Meat and Dairy and More Fruits and Vegetables</strong></p>
<p>Oops, sorry, this one belongs on a different resolution list.Â  But while weâ€™re on the topic this resolution has nothing to do with animal rightsâ€”just living longer and healthier.Â  Donâ€™t believe me&#8211;check out <a href="http://www.forksoverknives.com/about/" target="_blank">this documentary</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>The Real Resolution #5:Â  I Will Review the Effects of Obamacare on the Companyâ€™s Benefit Plans</strong></p>
<p>You will likely need help with this one.Â  <a href="https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B6-ZxYIAbUOOSGxGbTA5NGV4aWc/edit" target="_blank">Here</a> is a basic timeline for compliance with the Affordable Care Act. Â Weâ€™ve walked many clients through the maze.Â  Using a qualified law firm is best but a consultant can also work well but you must be careful when the consultant you are relying on also sells or brokers insurance products.Â  The good vendors will remind you, (usually in the fine print) to check with your own benefits attorney.</p>
<p>I hope this list of resolutions is helpful and I would appreciate it if you could post any of your own suggestions in the comments section.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markricciardi.org/top-five-2013-resolutions-for-employers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beware of the Myths</title>
		<link>http://www.markricciardi.org/beware-of-the-myths/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markricciardi.org/beware-of-the-myths/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 03:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Ricciardi]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exemptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NLRB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Overtime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wage-hour]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markricciardi.org/?p=19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A number of employers, even experienced or sophisticated employers sometimes believe, (or fool themselves in believing), some common myths about what is legal when it comes to employees.Â Â  Here are the some of the most common: MYTH #1Â Â Â Â Â Â Â  â€œOh, Iâ€™ll &#8230; <a href="http://www.markricciardi.org/beware-of-the-myths/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A number of employers, even experienced or sophisticated employers sometimes believe, (or fool themselves in believing), some common myths about what is legal when it comes to employees.Â Â  Here are the some of the most common:</p>
<p>MYTH #1Â Â Â Â Â Â Â  â€œOh, Iâ€™ll just put her on salary then I donâ€™t have to worry about tracking her hours or paying overtime.â€</p>
<p>In order to be exempt from overtime an employee needs to be paid on a salary basis but that employee must<em> also </em>perform duties that fit into one of the white-collar exemption categories.Â  That means the individual must be an executive, an administrator or professional.Â  Learn the legal requirements <a href="http://www.laborlawyers.com/files/33404_FLSA%20Exemptions%20and%20Recordkeeping%202012.PDF" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>MYTH #2Â Â Â Â Â Â Â  â€œMy pay practice is fine because my employee agreed to voluntarily work overtime hours at straight time.â€</p>
<p>Employers must pay non-exempt employees overtime at time and one half for all hours worked over forty in a workweek. Â Employees cannot waive the protection of this statute. Even if the employee never complains, when an audited by the United States Department of Labor the employer will be ordered to pay the overtime and possibly liquidated damages and civil money penalties.</p>
<p>MYTH #3Â Â Â Â Â  â€œIf a group of my employees start complaining too much about conditions around here I can just fire themâ€”after all they are at-will employees.â€</p>
<p>The National Labor Relations Act protects the right of employees to engage in concerted activity.Â  That concerted activity includes the right to get together as a group and discuss wages, hours and working conditions and complain to the boss about them, (and even go on strike!)Â  The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) enforces the National Labor Relations Act and the law <em>even applies to non-union companies</em>. Get familiar with the National Labor Relations Act <a href="http://www.laborlawyers.com/files/29388_NLRA%20ULP%20August%202011.PDF" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>MYTH #4Â Â Â Â Â Â Â  â€œWage rates are confidential and I can fire anyone who discloses his wage rate to a co-worker.â€</p>
<p>See the debunking of MYTH #3 aboveâ€”employees have the right to discuss among themselves their wages, hours and working conditions.</p>
<p>MYTH #5Â Â Â Â Â Â Â  â€œMy employee handbook is fine, I got it from a trusted source and I had my regular attorney review it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Years ago many attorneys could competently review an employee handbook for employment law compliance.Â  Now we have an activist NLRB that is declaring illegal certain language contained in most employee handbooks.Â  Common handbook sections on at-will employment, confidentiality, arbitration, after hour access to company premises, solicitation and distribution are being attacked as being in violation of the National Labor Relations Act.Â Â  Be sure an attorney who carefully follows the NLRB and is well versed in labor law reviews your handbook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markricciardi.org/beware-of-the-myths/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three Steps To Take Right Away</title>
		<link>http://www.markricciardi.org/three-steps-to-take-right-away/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markricciardi.org/three-steps-to-take-right-away/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 04:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Ricciardi]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exemptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independent Contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union avoidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wage-hour]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markricciardi.org/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No matter how many employees you have or what industry you are in, the current economic climate provides a good breeding ground for several specific problems. Here is a short list of potential issues and steps you can take now: &#8230; <a href="http://www.markricciardi.org/three-steps-to-take-right-away/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No matter how many employees you have or what industry you are in, the current economic climate provides a good breeding ground for several specific problems. Here is a short list of potential issues and steps you can take now:</p>
<p>1. WATCH HOW YOU PAY PEOPLE</p>
<p>Two different initiatives have converged to make employers who pay improperly prime targets in 2012.</p>
<p>a. The US DOL Is on a Missionâ€”And Has Funding</p>
<p>The Obama Campaign promised to beef up enforcement of employee protections. The President made good on that promise in part by funding increases for the Department of Labor (DOL). Thatâ€™s the agency that enforces the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Even with a budget compromise in the works donâ€™t expect that the DOL enforcement budget will suffer much.</p>
<p>Here in Las Vegas the DOL office was a â€œresident officeâ€ that was merely a satellite of the Phoenix District Office and was down to two or three investigators. Now Las Vegas is its own District. That means that we have a District Director, an Assistant District Director and are on track to have eight or more investigators. While the new District Director and Assistant seem like reasonable folks, make no mistake that they are here to enforce the FLSA. Keep in mind that, except for the daily overtime provision, the Nevada Overtime Law has fewer teeth than the FLSA. Therefore on many overtime issues if the couple of DOL investigators had never made it to your company your company had received a pass for many years.</p>
<p>Now you should get ready to have your overtime practices scrutinized. Expect to be questioned about why you consider certain positions to be exempt from overtime. Expect your timekeeping procedures and records to be questioned. Even if you are trying to everything right it is easy to make wage-hour mistakes and many good employers do.</p>
<p>What can you do right now? Perform a wage-hour self audit. The idea is to do what the DOL would do if it showed up for an auditâ€”but do it yourself now while you have time to correct mistakes or reconsider the risky things you have been doing on purpose. Self audits can be done by your employment attorneys. They can also be done in house â€“weâ€™ve taught lots of clients how. Just donâ€™t ignore the issue.</p>
<p>b. States Lose Employment Tax Money When There Are Fewer Employees</p>
<p>Sure there are fewer employees because companies have done layoffs and are doing more with fewer people. Employers have also turned to outsourcing which can sometimes save money as well. But many employers also use independent contractors instead of employees. The risk is that you might â€œmisclassifyâ€ an individual as a contractor when under the law he or she would actually be considered an employee. Whether you have been doing that for years or have just started during the economic crisis, remember that you are potentially at risk. Various Nevada agencies are aggressively auditing employers, including the Employment Security Department (ESD) and the Nevada Labor Commission. Expect the DOL to look at that issue too. When you misclassify an individual as a contractor you are subject to potential tax liability, overtime or minimum wage liability and the entire panoply of roll-ups. Benefits and ERISA claims are not out of the question.</p>
<p>What is your action step now? As discussed above, the wage-hour self audit is your best bet. And for this one be sure to obtain legal helpâ€”the test for independent contractor status is tricky and different government agencies use different legal tests.</p>
<p>2. WATCH HOW YOU HANDLE DISCRIMINATON AND HARASSMENT COMPLAINTS AS WELL AS ADA COMPLAINTS</p>
<p>In the last legislature, the Nevada Equal Rights Commission (NERC) faced the end of the road. Its funding was slashed and nearly eliminated. Even well before that happened the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) opened a resident office here in Las Vegas. It had been well known that the EEOC felt that NERC was not aggressive enough with Nevada employersâ€”especially with the evil casinos. Casinos never got a free pass from NERC, but that story gave the Federal Government a great excuse to spend money on a new EEOC office.</p>
<p>Now every Nevada employer, casino or not, will be hearing from the EEOC. Discrimination charges with merit, and therefore legal exposure, will still need to be dealt with by employers as before. But not long ago there were new regulations released by the EEOC regarding the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Because of those regulations few ADA cases will now be won by employers simply because the plaintiff did not fit the technical legal defination of â€œdisabledâ€. Therefore expect that the EEOC will take even marginal cases or those with little or no damages and try to make examples of employers who have not done the basics. By the basics I mean:</p>
<p>â— Having a comprehensive and up to date discrimination and harassment policy.</p>
<p>â— Performing regular and comprehensive training for supervisors on harassment and discrimination prevention.</p>
<p>â— Using (and documenting the use of) a formal interactive process to deal with employees requesting an accommodation.</p>
<p>The EEOC must justify its new Las Vegas officeâ€”expect to hear from them.</p>
<p>3. ANTICIPATE AND BE READY FOR UNION ORGANIZING</p>
<p>Once again, here there are two converging factors, both of which require you to be vigilant.</p>
<p>a. Unions Are Losing Ground and Need Members Who Will Pay Dues</p>
<p>Itâ€™s no secret that unions are at their lowest membership levels ever. Membership has continued to decline, from 12.3% of the workforce to 11.9%. Only 6.9% of private sector employees are now organized.</p>
<p>This means that unions will continue to aggressively attack industries where the jobs cannot be exported: hospitality, health care and government. But note that in the past unions have concentrated on the largest employers. Unions get the largest payoff in dues and generally do better in elections where the bargaining unit is large. But with the crisis now faced by unions even small employers in any industry can be a target and need to be ready.</p>
<p>What can you do right now? There are many things an employer can do to union proof the workforce and I will discuss many of them in future blog posts. At least for now learn the basics about the law of union organizing by reading <a href="http://www.laborlawyers.com/files/27190_NLRA%20Union%20ORG%202011%20final.PDF">this booklet</a> on the union organizing aspects of the National Labor Relations Act. Also read <a href="http://www.laborlawyers.com/files/29388_NLRA%20ULP%20August%202011.PDF">this booklet</a> on unfair labor practice liabilty under the National Labor Relations Act.</p>
<p>Also consider performing a union vulnerability audit on your own or with the help of your labor attorney. Start by using <a href="http://www.laborlawyers.com/files/31118_Employee%20Relations%20Audit%20Checklist%20FINAL.pdf">this tool</a>. Â  Many of our clients have made changes based on the audit results and those changes have helped insulate companies from organizing.</p>
<p>b. The Obama Administration Could Not Deliver EFCA To the Unions so Instead Has Delivered the NLRB</p>
<p>You should know by now that the National Labor Relations Board is dominated by labor friendly appointees. And not just garden-variety labor friendly appointees but folks who are dedicated to making it easier for unions organize your company. The NLRB, even without Congress changing a word of the National Labor Relations Act can drastically change the rules that apply to union elections and how unfair labor charges are prosecuted.</p>
<p>Hereâ€™s one very recent example. After a union lost an election it filed an objection with the NLRB and asked that the election results be thrown out and a new election held. The objection alleged that the employer committed misconduct during the election. The misconduct? Simply having a couple of rules in the employee handbook that could affect employee rights protected under the National Labor Relations Act. There was no evidence that any of the alleged improper rules were enforced during the union campaign. There was also no evidence that any of the alleged improper rules inhibited any employee activity during the union campaign. Nor was there any evidence that any of the employees even knew about the rules! You can read this crazy NLRB case <a href="https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B6-ZxYIAbUOOZjlmMmY4N2QtOTQ4Ny00ZDcwLTkwYzItMzY2MDFmZjM0MjQ3">here</a>.</p>
<p>What can you do now? Have your employee handbook carefully reviewed by a competent labor attorney, not just someone who practices in the general employment field. We have found rules in many of our clientâ€™s handbooks that would be considered unlawful by the NLRB but with some minor revisions can be brought into full compliance with current law.</p>
<p>Iâ€™ll have more about all of the above topics in future blog posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markricciardi.org/three-steps-to-take-right-away/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
